Simplifying insurance policy purchase

Project Umbrella, a joint Bancassurance collaboration with Allianz, Prudential, and Standard Chartered, was conceptualised in early 2018 and went live in October 2019. This project aimed to allow users to purchase micro-coverages (bite-sized insurance policies) covering core pillars of insurance such as Travel, Health, Home, and Motor.

Role

Lead product designer

Type

Design Concept Exploration, Leading UX Research, Stakeholder Management

Year

2018

Process

A revamped landing page was designed for the insurance products offered on the app, with a UI design incorporating a light style in line with Standard Chartered's corporate brand guidelines. These designs were then adapted to a Desktop iBanking platform.

The study involved several participants and various methodologies such as self-reported understanding and explanation, open card sorting, and closed card sorting were used to understand participant perspectives on insurance and purchasing decisions.

One key finding of the study was that

Participants often misunderstood the meaning of specific insurance coverages, interpreting them based on their names rather than their actual purpose.

The study also found that participants tended to

Categorise the coverages based on health and property, with travel and motor appearing as standalone categories for some participants.

Additionally, the study explored the factors that influence a user's purchasing decision, including the perceived relevance and necessity of the insurance, the impact of the insurance on their life, the suitability of the insurance for their needs, and the affordability and value of the insurance.

Purchasing Decision Tree: Breakdown

1. Relevance of Category

Participants only consider the coverage which are relevant to them. If the category says “Property”, those without a property will just strike it off from their minds.

2. Necessity of the Insurance (assuming that they understand the insurance)

Probability. Participants tend to judge if they are likely to be exposed to the risk. (e.g. Cancer risk is higher than modifying house due to disability) This is based off a few factors: Family history, word of mouth from friends/family, relatable real life scenarios.

3. Impact

Participants assess if they could afford the consequence if the event happens to them. (e.g. “I could afford a new microwave if I break the one at home accidently”)

After discovering research outcomes, I translated the findings into a series of screens for the next round of concept and usability testing.

Entry points and product detail pages were used in the concept testing.

Coverage, plan and additional benefits selection used in the concept testing.

Key findings from the concept testing found that:

1) Users misunderstand specific insurance coverages based on their names rather than their purpose
2) Users are confused about policy options and add-ons, including which plans are for themselves or their children and which add-ons apply to which policy
3) Pricing breakdowns are unclear, and users have difficulty understanding differences between basic policies and add-ons
4) Navigation and user interface design issues, including difficulty associating the selected plan with the benefit below and uncertainty about which plan is actually selected
5) Issues with the "Show More" layout and confusion around the tiers
6) Users expect the app to send policy information and quotes to their email address
7) Personal details screen is unclear, and users don't see the value in adjusting policy start dates for medical coverage
8) One policy number for PA and HC gives the impression that users have purchased one policy for two insurance types
9) Users want to know the benefits of using different cards and expect a second level of authorisation (e.g., OTP) to complete transactions

Many users don't know the definition of "General Insurance" and struggle to differentiate between life and general insurance

Armed with the insights gained from both discovery and concept testing, I swiftly made updates and adjustments to the screens to meet the deadline for the first MVP release. The final sets of screens below were approved by the stakeholders and successfully released in 2018.

(Landing page) I revisited the UX writing and simplified the overall product selection interface.

(Product details) After team discussion, we concluded that this update was more valuable and useful as a bank-wide component update since the template had been used across all banking products.

(Plan selection) I reduced and simplified the number of steps required to provide the information needed for plan selection. Additionally, I simplified the plan selection table to focus on a single view, rather than providing a comparative view.

Top to bottom: (Plan review and payment) I addressed information confusion to the best of my ability through UX writing. However, there were also technical considerations that needed to be managed.

Outcome

After conducting thorough discovery, concept, usability testing and doing multiple design revisions, the team confidently rolled out the final designs in 2018.

Despite my departure from the bank, it has recently come to my attention that they have decided to sunset the design and migrate the majority of flows and purchase journeys to the respective insurance service providers. However, the bank has retained the entry point designs, which were also developed under my leadership.

(Left to right) New products landing page, revised icons with pre-existing insurance landing page, existing product details page, new application within service provider's website

Other work

Want to create something awesome? Drop me an email.

→ lukelinsj@gmail.com